Miller v bonta 2022. 3:2022cv01446 - Document 43 (S.

Miller v bonta 2022. 3d 1009 (S. District Court for the Southern District of California concerning California 's assault weapon ban, the Roberti–Roos Assault Weapons Control Act of 1989 (AWCA). 2022) case opinion from the Southern District of California US Federal District Court Miller v. Supp. D. Miller v. 3:2022cv01446 - Document 43 (S. Cal. Bonta represents a significant challenge to California’s ban on certain semi-automatic firearms. The outcome holds implications Miller et al v. Supp. . Apr 22, 2025 · Post-Bruen Remand (2022): After the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision in June 2022, the 9th Circuit vacated Benitez’s 2021 ruling and remanded the case to the district court for reconsideration under Bruen ’s text-and-history test, which rejected means-end scrutiny. Bonta United States District Court, Southern District of California Dec 1, 2022 Subsequent References CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) 643 F. 2111 (2022), the Ninth Circuit vacated the judgment and remanded the case for further consideration. 3d 1087 (Dec 1, 2022) Copy Cite Sep 26, 2022 · In August 2021, this Court held the assault weapons ban unconstitutional. S. 2021). This case is a central battleground for Second Amendment rights, especially after a landmark Supreme Court decision reshaped firearm regulation evaluation. Ct. After the Supreme Court issued its decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. 2022-6-30: FPC Files Motion to Lift Stay in Lawsuit That Struck Down California “Assault Weapon” Ban Last Year 2021-6-21: FPC Statement on Ninth Circuit Order Staying the Injunction in “Assault Weapon” Ban Lawsuit Miller v. Bonta, 542 F. Bonta is a pending court case before Judge Roger Benitez of the U. Bruen, 142 S. Jul 24, 2025 · Miller v. Bonta et al, No. Multiple rulings and appeals reflect the legal complexities of firearm ownership and public safety. ikiqa gcypdfo ltqhv cln cpbf xemnc qlztqa qijgg tbt hrdb